Questions About Mark Woodman:

How Do We Know The Bible is True?
This is a great series of lectures on the bible, that clearly answer most questions about the origins of the bible and the Christian religion.

  • scripture under scrutiny – here
    This shows why the bible is the most attacked book in human history, and how it has stood up to these attacks. 
  • Why are there 66 books in the bible? – here
    This answers the important question, what about the Gnostic Gospels? What about the Apocrypha? When was the canon decided? Who decided the canon? 
  • The Authentic Christ –  here
    This answers: How do we know Christ is the genuine article?
  • The Life of William Tyndalle (translator of the bible into english) – here
    This explains the history of the english bible.
Creation or Evolution? – here
Was the Great Pyramid built before the flood? here
What are the Nephilim? here
Doctrinal Questions:
  • Is Jesus Christ, Michael the Archangel? – mp3 – youtube
  • Is Jesus God? – mp3 – youtube
  • Who is the Holy Spirit – mp3 – youtube
  • What Is The Seal of God? – mp3 – youtube
  • Should We Expect a Last Day Prophet? – mp3 – youtube
  • Is Ellen White a Prophet? – mp3 – youtube
  • What is Spiritual Israel? – mp3 – youtube
  • What does it mean to fear God? – mp3 – youtube
  • Where do the wicked go when they die? (hell) – article (3 videos)
What Does It Mean To Be A Pharisee?
  • Paul G – The Leaven of the Pharisees – 01 – Introduction – mp3 – youtube
  • Paul G – The Leaven of the Pharisees – 02 – The 1st Woe – mp3 – youtube
  • Paul G – The Leaven of the Pharisees – 03 – The 2nd Woe – mp3 – youtube
  • Paul G – The Leaven of the Pharisees – 04 – The 3rd Woe – mp3 – youtube
Who is the King of the North / Is Uriah Smith Correct on Prophecy? – here
What is the Healthiest way to eat?here

Should Women be ordained?youtube

What is the Latter Rain?  When did it start Falling? here

30 thoughts on “FAQs

    • What is it you need to know? The best way to find the full truth on prophecy is to go to the shop and either buy or download a free copy of Uriah Smith’s book “Daniel and the Revelation”

  1. MARK GOT IT! EVEN WALTER DOESN’T TEACH IT…… i want to view his “(real)” conclusion on “sun” worship! he was in agreement with what i teach.



    • I guess it all comes down to your belief in the prophet of God. She is very clear on where to find the truth on prophecy. The NWO is not actually possible according to Nebecadnezzars dream. What you are teaching is exactly what Des Ford teaches, and is (ironically) Jesuit doctrine.

  2. that’s why they killed mark???????? whatever….
    let me know how her false teachings work for you (in the end)? why did she wait till james died to have the “obelisks” placed in the graveyard? phallus worship is still phallus worship; straight from egypt! and where did you say Samuele Bacchiocchi was educated b 4 he was asked to come to andrews univ? who wrote the forward to: from sabbath to “SUN”-day? oooPS! if you want to “SEE” the obelisks; i will send them to you????? if we work harder CHRIST will come sooner???????? where is that in scripture? next to the Baal-(MASS) tree/wafer-sun disc you celebrate on dec. 25th against jeremiah 10:2-?, ezekiel 8:14-18?
    easter(ishtar)?? come…. justify all this???? oh yeah AND the Investigative Judgement too????? my bible states CHRIST ascended to the Father’s throne immediately after the 500 saw him(after His resurrection)???? let me know how the queen of heaven does in saving you! later!

    • Hello again. I’m glad you are passionate about what you believe. I don’t believe you are correct, but I am glad you are willing to stand up for what you believe.

      Mark believed, as I do, that there was/is certainly a conspiracy to attempt to create a one world government. However, the bible is clear they will be unsuccessful… remember the feet of iron and clay, and then the rock smashing them.

      Did “they” kill Mark, I’m not sure who “they” would be… but I would say unlikely. The conspiracies that Mark talked about (which I believe were accurate) are generally ignored by the public. Most people just treat them as an amusement. The Catholic Church realises now the best way to turn people from the truth is via confusion. This is why Louis Were / Samuele Bacchiocchi / Des Ford / Prescott / Leeroy Froom / etc etc were introduced into the SDA church in order to turn it away from the Pioneers teachings, and to place doubt on the testimonies. The SDA church is most certainly in trouble on a lot of issues. This is why we did the series “Rebuilding Adventism”.

      As far as the obelisk on EG Whites grave, for one, she and James were both dead at this point, so it is hardly something she can be charged for. Either way, to me fruit is more important than symbol. Her writings uplift Christ and a connection with him. Plus God used her to show us the means of attaining victory over sin. What could be better than that! I don’t know about you, but I would rather not be a slave of the devil through my temper or other various satanic traits.

      Also, I agree with you on Christmas and Easter, and so did EG White. Ellen White is quite clear that Christmas is a pagan festival and we can simply use the time, not to give gifts to each other and decorate trees, but to help people come to an understanding of the truth. Some in the SDA church have taken her statements on this topic as licence to keep it. She however says only that it is a good time to evangelize… just as the release of The Da Vinci Code book was a good time to evangelize. Does this mean it is a sin to cut down a tree and put it in your house… no… but it seems like an awful waste of energy! To decorate it would certainly fall into the category that you stated, and she never gave any licence to do this.

      As far as the investigative Judgement, both Mark believed in that, as I do. It is very clear from the bible. And yes, Christ did ascend to heaven at that time. Did his ministration in the Most Holy Place start then? No. Check out this sermon: 2012-07-28- Paul Godfrey – The Investigative Judgement – http://youtu.be/Sc5dIeKZv2c

  3. Hi. I really enjoy watching Paul Godfrey’s sermons. Just wondering if you know what church he preaches at? It would be good to visit (if he is not too far from home!).


    • I am glad you have gained a blessing. Paul preaches in a small church near Wamuran qld Australia. You are most welcome to visit if you are in the area. It is north of Brisbane.

    • I’m not sure if there is a church who believes exactly what we do, but there may be a local SDA or imssdarm church. It is difficult to recommend any, as churches are very different in different countries. For example, in some areas in the US, the SDA church is pretty good.. But here in Australia, it feels like you are visiting a depressed Pentecostal church. That changes all over the country too. If you check out the SDA website or sda1888.org, you may find a good church in your local area. Just keep looking around, and pray a lot.

      God bless

      • Hahaha….Yes the SDA i visited was not what i was expecting, a bit far from what i learn online. I think i’ll keep praying to God, he’ll make a way.

      • Any chance you can post some music on the site. Sometimes me and my family want to listen to heavenly music, the kind of music you guys listen to. But we cant find any on the site.

  4. Hi
    I have truly been enlightened by Mark Woodman sermons and would love to share them; I was wondering if they were available with subtitles in other languages as most of my family and relatives do not speak English.
    Tried to email info@homebase.org.za but nobody got back to me.. could you help?
    Many thanks

  5. mark woodman is Godly inspired,and out to inspire many.have been personally touched by his sermons.what Lilly happened to this man of God.he should have lived to see what is happening dodgy.am an Adventist . but was not such fully informed as he did but he has helped me open up my mind.surely Jesus is coming soon.

  6. I got your Daniel and Revelation book expecting it to be the 1897 Edition as it is noted and promoted. This book is misleading because it Is not the 1897 edition but apparently the 1914 edition since it refers to events that happened after he died without any notations.
    Apparently you do not believe what U Smith believed or what EGW promoted.

    • Hi Jack,
      You are correct, there appears to be a few extra things added. No by me though, this is taken directly from folio views, and their claim is it is the last version published when he was alive and that it is the 1897 edition. I believe it has very few extras from the 1911 edition (un-noted as you suggest), I contemplated editing it out, and making annotations however, at the time I had no earlier editions to go by, and I don’t have an 1897 edition so I can only go of the egw estates to find the exact changes added. They make no mention of this.
      I have an 1871 edition now, and a 1911, but so far I have found no major discrepancies. Though the 1911 does have things removed that the edition released still has. So to say it is the 1914 edition is false. At most it has bits added from the 1911, but nothing removed. This is of course not ideal, but I am not sure how to revise it in order to make an accurate representation of what it is. The egw database seems willing to call it the 1897 edition, so that’s all I have been able to deal with currently.
      If I believed there were any doctrinal differences added between editions, I would seriously consider a revision or at least annotations. Sadly I have very little time to do this, and I believe it is a very solid resource as it is. If people wish to check it, they are welcome to download the PDF for free (or just read it in folio views with poor formatting).
      As far as me not believing what egw promoted, I am not sure which doctrines are changed? There was no real change in prophecy belief until after egw died, and particularly when the 1940 edition was released. I would recommend to anyone editions prior to 1915.
      If there are any direct prophecy changes, I would certainly like to know about them.

      God bless

  7. Hi,
    I have recently started following Mark woodman’s sermons. With regards to his teachings of the sanctuary and the heavenly one I would wish to know what he made of Rev 21:22 which states that he saw no temple in the city for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it?

    Please help me to understand

    • That is referring to the New Jerusalem, not heaven. This is after the judgement has been set and after the 1000 years in heaven where the judgments are checked over by the saved. Once the sin problem is over, there will be no need for the ministration in the Sanctuary, and in that sense it will become redundant as we will then be able to communicate directly with God.

      Heb 8:1 Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens;
      Heb 8:2 A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.

    • Hi Rachel,
      There is no doubt the SDA church is not perfect (it certainly wasn’t in Ellen White’s day either), however I personally do pay tithe to the SDA church. I believe there are still many good ministers within the church who are upholding the truth.
      There were two primary things that made me believe this was the right the to do:
      1. The widows mite was given into a church that was far more corrupt than the modern day SDA church, and Christ commended her for it. This is not an excuse for the church, God will judge harshly many in the church (this is not my job though!).
      2. This quote seemed to me to be fairly clear:
      You who have been withholding your means from the cause of God, read the book of Malachi, and see what is spoken there in regard to tithes and offerings. Cannot you see that it is not best under any circumstances to withhold your tithes and offerings because you are not in harmony with everything your brethren do? The tithes and offerings are not the property of any man, but are to be used in doing a certain work for God. Unworthy ministers may receive some of the means thus raised, but dare any one, because of this, withhold from the treasury, and brave the curse of God? I dare not. I pay my tithes gladly and freely, saying, as did David, “Of thine own have we given thee.” A selfish withholding from God will tend to poverty in our own souls. Act your part, my brethren and sisters. God loves you, and He stands at the helm. If the Conference business is not managed according to the order of the Lord, that is the sin of the erring ones. The Lord will not hold you responsible for it, if you do what you can to correct the evil. But do not commit sin yourselves by withholding from God his own property. “Cursed be he that doeth the work of the Lord negligently,” or deceitfully.–2SAT 74, 75

      I have seen independent ministries argue that this is referring to “the cause of God” not “the SDA church organisation”. However, I think any honest individual would see this is clearly referring to the SDA organisation.

      Is the SDA church fallen though? I believe it is as ancient Israel. Because they failed to take on the 1888 message, the church was forced to wander the wilderness until everyone was dead and a new revival could come up and teach the truth of God’s message. I believe many good ministers are bringing this message back. Sure there is apostasy at the borders of Caanan, but this is what we should expect if “all these things were given for ensamples upon whom the ends of the world are come”.

      This is by no means a comprehensive reasoning, but for me, this is the skeleton of the reasoning which made me 1 return to the church, and 2 resume paying tithe to the church. What you decided to do however, is between you and God.

      God bless.

      • Thanks jumanous,
        love that EGW quote! everything in your reply was helpful. I also thought of Judas who was the treasurer and although Jesus knew he was stealing he still promoted tithing.

        Personally, I wouldn’t use the word “fallen” though as you did because it has connotations that are not applicable to the 1888 rejection, but I digress

    • Another question. I was seeing a preterist in YouTube called Don K Preston and he said something that Got me confused he said “that if Isaiah 19:1 is talking about God coming in the clouds which we know is symbolic, then how can the second coming be literal and physical?” I showed him all the verses saying he will come with a shout but he keeps saying and show me verses that’s said the same thing happen in the past so it’s just symbolic. I’m having a hard time can you help me with this ?

      • Hi,
        It is always interesting finding when to take something as a symbol or literal.
        I think when you see the language used in Isaiah 19, it is clearly talking in symbols as he says, however I believe he makes the mistake of taking single phrases and assuming the must be used the same way everywhere.
        For example, I could use his logic to say that Genesis 1:6 where God parted the waters from the waters is talking about parting the nations from the nations because often in prophecy waters represents nations.

        Context is key and if you read the text in context, clearly Isaiah 19 is filled with symbolic language, however if you read the text in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18, you can see clearly the purpose of Paul’s writing is to build the faith of the Thessalonians with a beautiful description of the hope of a real future event. He even tells us his intention at the end of his description… have a read in context and let me know if you see what I mean:
        But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope. [14] For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. [15] For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. [16] For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: [17] Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. [18] Wherefore comfort one another with these words.

        God bless

    • Hi,
      The dead sea scrolls are the best evidence we currently have (that I am aware of).
      The book was written around 606BC (around that time), however the dead sea scrolls were dated around 200-300BC. Even if we take the most skepitcal approach, we would have to concede that he predicted the rise of the Grecian and Roman empires and the Papal Roman Empire… incredibly improbable if we assume random chance as his method.

Leave a Reply